The introduction of automated and autonomous systems in airport ground handling offers potential efficiency and safety benefits but also raises new risks related to human–machine interaction, oversight, and accountability. This paper emphasizes that automation must demonstrably enhance safety, retain effective human supervision and intervention, and be supported by thorough risk assessments and clear regulation. When properly designed and implemented, ground automation can improve resilience while ensuring that safety‑critical human roles remain central to ground operations.
Related Publications

April 27, 2026
Infographic: Annex 13 at a Glance
Delays, incomplete findings, or the absence of published accident investigation reports deprive the industry of critical safety insights. These insights

April 6, 2026
Human Performance Impacts of Civil Aviation Operations in Conflict Zones
Exceptional operations require exceptional safeguards. Conflict zone operations must continue to be treated as exceptional circumstances regardless of duration, as

February 26, 2026
Background Checks for Pilots
In view of the concerns expressed by a number of IFALPA’s Member Associations concerning the arbitrary and sometimes unclear methods

February 24, 2026

February 24, 2026
Endangerment of Flight Operationsby Protesters
An increasing number of protest actions have disrupted flight operations through breaches of airport perimeters and Security Restricted Areas, exposing

February 24, 2026
Cyber Threats
IFALPA and IFATCA have identified the possibility of a cyber-attack against an aircraft, ground facility, or other critical infrastructure to